Windows bashing was: Re: Voxin was: Re: Switching to Linux

[Glenn]

Microsoft Security Essentials is free for personal use.  The state of 
Nebraska uses the corporate version.  When xP is no longer supported, if I 
want to keep using XP, I will need a non-Microsoft alternative to Security 
Essentials.
Glenn

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tony Baechler" <tony at baechler.net>
To: "Speakup is a screen review system for Linux." 
<speakup at linux-speakup.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 3:33 AM
Subject: Re: Windows bashing was: Re: Voxin was: Re: Switching to Linux


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

As I said, my experience with AVG was many years ago on Windows 98, so
perhaps some of the issues are fixed nowadays.  My machine didn't totally
lock up, but it was so slow that it might as well have.  I could just plan
on not having my machine for about 15 minutes and there seemed to be no
way to stop it.  I looked into it last year for my brother's Windows 7
notebook and it wasn't recommended.  Norton Internet Security and
Microsoft Security Essentials seemed to be the recommended options, so we
went with Norton because it's relatively cheap and the notebook is for
business.  AVG was not free for personal use as I recall, but after not
only my problems with it but reading about several other people having
problems and several months going by with no updates, I assumed it was
dead.  I thought I read that you had to pay some nominal fee even for
personal use, but that could be wrong.  I know that it isn't licensed for
a business which was the main concern.  I liked the looks of Nod32, but it
was too expensive compared to Norton and the other options.  As it turned
out, his Norton expired and he's onto something else anyway.  Avast now
seems to be the recommended personal free virus scanner.

On my machine here, I actually do have a virus scanner installed, but I
don't run it in the background.  It's called ClamWin and is the same as
clamav but for Windows.  It works well enough for me without constantly
running and eating up resources while still scanning downloads and zip
files.  I almost never open email attachments, so that isn't an issue here.

On 5/11/2013 5:35 PM, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 01:13:16AM -0700, Tony Baechler wrote:
>> AVG is now pretty much dead and it was the antivirus which totally
>> made my machine come to a complete stop at 8 AM daily.  OK, it turned
>> out that it's a scheduling "feature" which is part of AVG, but I
>> couldn't turn it off.  I could change when it ran, but no matter
>> what, it was going to do a full virus scan every day whether I liked
>> it or not.  So much for me controlling the machine, but that's
>> typical Windows behavior.
>
> What do you mean when you say that AVG is pretty much dead? I use
> AVG-free on one of my machines here, and it still seems to be very much
> alive. It has definition updates daily as far as I can tell. It also
> seems to come out with a minor version upgrade about every half a year,
> and with a major version upgrade about once a year.
>
> As far as your box locking up, you must have been running on a very
> old machine. I'm running AVG-free 2013 on a 2.2GHz pentium IV single
> core with no hyperthreading, and one gig of RAM. The machine doesn't
> fly while doing virus scanning, but it's still quite useable, and
> fairly responsive. As far as scheduling full virus scans, it is
> possible to schedule both how often AVG-free runs them, and at what
> time of day. I have mine scheduled to run once a week for instance.
> Guess what? You can even turn off full virus scanning completely if you
> don't want it to run at all on any schedule.
>
> I'm not trying to defend AVG-free. Like many things, it isn't perfect.
> I do know from personal experience though that your statements above
> aren't correct regarding the latest version of AVG-free. As far as
> controlling your machine, I'll admit that windows doesn't give you as
> much control as GNU/Linux does. Having said that, I still maintain that
> windows, and AVG-free give the user quite a bit of control. I would say
> it gives the user more control than it doesn't. It's just a matter of
> knowing what to set, and where, and the internet is your friend here if
> your own knowledge comes up short.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=SBlK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup at linux-speakup.org
http://linux-speakup.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/speakup