speakup and vim problem with key echo
Gaijin
gaijin at clearwire.net
Wed Aug 4 04:40:04 EDT 2010
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 07:04:57PM -0700, Steve Holmes wrote:
> This is an interesting area but isn't utf-8 becoming the defacto
> standard and the ultimately better way to go?
I don't know about better, myself. UTF uses twice as many bits
as iso-115x. and while I may wish to support the new UTF format, I feel
no need to work in it. I just feel that wasting space is space wasted,
both on my hard drives, no matter how big they get, and a waste of
processing power. My LiteTalk hardware synthesizer was made prior to
UTF, and the computer will just have to convert everything from UTF back
to iso-1159, just so I can hear the computer. My computer doesn't need
to be multilingual. I only speak English, and for most things, I
convert everything to plaintext. It is guaranteed to work with every
piece of equipment I own, takes little effort on the CPU's part to
shovel it into any synthesizer, and takes up less space. I figure with
double the character bit-width, compressing a UTF file with gzip would
take as much space as an uncompressed iso file. I might as well go back
to Windows, start over-clocking, and use a win-modem if I'm going to
waste CPU cycles like that. ;p
Michael
More information about the Speakup
mailing list