speakup and vim problem with key echo
Rynhardt Kruger
rynkruger at gmail.com
Wed Aug 4 12:19:45 EDT 2010
My understanding is that UTF-8 uses only one byte when the character is in the ascii range.
Take care,
Rynhardt
* Gaijin <gaijin at clearwire.net> [100804 10:37]:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 07:04:57PM -0700, Steve Holmes wrote:
> > This is an interesting area but isn't utf-8 becoming the defacto
> > standard and the ultimately better way to go?
>
> I don't know about better, myself. UTF uses twice as many bits
> as iso-115x. and while I may wish to support the new UTF format, I feel
> no need to work in it. I just feel that wasting space is space wasted,
> both on my hard drives, no matter how big they get, and a waste of
> processing power. My LiteTalk hardware synthesizer was made prior to
> UTF, and the computer will just have to convert everything from UTF back
> to iso-1159, just so I can hear the computer. My computer doesn't need
> to be multilingual. I only speak English, and for most things, I
> convert everything to plaintext. It is guaranteed to work with every
> piece of equipment I own, takes little effort on the CPU's part to
> shovel it into any synthesizer, and takes up less space. I figure with
> double the character bit-width, compressing a UTF file with gzip would
> take as much space as an uncompressed iso file. I might as well go back
> to Windows, start over-clocking, and use a win-modem if I'm going to
> waste CPU cycles like that. ;p
>
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
More information about the Speakup
mailing list