editors

[Chuck Hallenbeck]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Michael,

Before moving to emacs, give "ne" a spin. I have abandoned nano in
favor of ne and like it a lot. "ne" stands for "nice editor".

Chuck


On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:59:52PM +0000, Michael Whapples wrote:
> Hello,
> I am currently looking for a better editor than my current favourite
> (nano). I have just been doing some bash scripting training, and in that
> they were teaching using vi (the training was for people who may never
> have used unix before), but I have to say I just wasn't getting on with
> vi. How does speakup work with vi best? I found it not very good. People
> were saying to me that nano isn't so powerful (and I know what they are
> getting at), so I am thinking about emacs (or emacspeak). It seems more
> to my liking than vi, but I have a few questions about it. If I were to
> use emacspeak, how is it best to stop conflicts of speakup and emacspeak
> wanting to use the same synth (an apollo in my case)? Or is it good to
> use emacs with speakup (so doing away with emacspeak? Or alternatively,
> is there any other editors people might suggest.
> 
> From
> Michael Whapples
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup

- -- 
The Moon is Waning Gibbous (54% of Full)

         My web site is located at: http://hallenbeck.ftml.net
                We can only see a short distance ahead,
           but we can see plenty there that needs to be done.
                           A.N. Turing, 1950
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHKdKK0maTgpPXM9cRAiClAJ9rUk6i5f8ms/u222Rkvi+2i08FsgCaAvV5
GEhIpX39MFXGabxucPy8rRk=
=16TK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----