imcom or centericq?

Steve Holmes steve at holmesgrown.com
Fri Apr 9 03:20:42 EDT 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

How do you go about using Jaber? I created me an account on it last
week after I got up to the latest version of Centericq (4.9.11) and I
really don't know what to do with Jaber.  Now this version works
directly with MSN again so probably don't need Jaber unless it is
viable on its own merit.  Centericq supports bMSN, ICQ, Jaber, Yahoo,
and others.  The biggest chalenge now is tracking people down.

On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 10:34:32PM -0700, David Csercsics wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >Once I get my Linux box on line, I was wondering which would be the better alternative for instant messaging, center icq or imcom.
> 
> Without question imcom! It supports the msn protocol and all of
> the other messaging protocols through jabber's gateways and the
> interface is very good. Centericq is somewhat awkward by comparison
> in my opinion. You only need Python and expat installed for imcom to
> work. Readline is also required but you probably already have that
> but install the -dev package for readline if you are going to build
> imcom from source.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> 
> 

- -- 
HolmesGrown Solutions
The best solutions for the best price!
http://ld.net/?holmesgrown
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAdk7BWSjv55S0LfERAiKBAJ9tB9kCSqz74+AZMBqz0ucDO4BFdQCgvh1q
mmpETczRlZn6Q43y2uEme6Y=
=5xZa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Speakup mailing list