imcom or centericq?

[Alex Snow]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

imcom's interface is based on commands kind of like irc which may make 
it more complicated. centericq's interface is more menu driven but 
harder to use with speakup. It's really a persona.l preference. Imcom 
however only supports jabber from what I saw...while centericq 
supports a hole bunch of different protocols.
On 
Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:07:55AM -0400, Jes and guide dog Harley wrote:
> Hi all,
> Once I get my Linux box on line, I was wondering which would be the better alternative for instant messaging, center icq or i m
> com? I've tried to install imcom but dpkg says something about me needing the python xml base which isn't installed. I wish Debian
> woody 3.0 r2 came with the thing. Oh well. I would like everyone's opinions on this, please.
> Thank you a lot.
> Jes
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup

- -- 
Sigh.  I like to think it's just the Linux people who want to be on
the "leading edge" so bad they walk right off the precipice.
	-- Craig E. Groeschel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAdr359XVrM3ri110RAodhAKCEBhKvNRO7U+DZSU4G+a5w7dl8EgCeLReJ
EgT16zSQm2XZVjrwL6oaNRU=
=JFbi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----