Network card problems

[Bear in SFO]

at's just the subnet mask.  Your subnet should be, from the info you gave us, X

Check your other machine and check if the first 3 of the 4 group of numbers 
matches the above pattern...

Afterall it may not be a bad idea to just get a new card - Fast Ethernet 
cards are no more than $20 these days.

I know, I still have, oh, maybe 15 of those 3C509s and they are just 
sitting there coz they ain't worth anything anymore (then again I can't 
complaint coz I got them for free)

--David

At 08:56 AM 10/6/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Yup, I'm on the same subnet as the router, 255.255.255.0.  The other machine
>on the network has net access perfictly fine.
>Explorer has caused a general protection fault in module kernel32.dll. I'm
>sick of Winblows!
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Igor Gueths" <igueths at attbi.com>
>To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
>Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 9:34 PM
>Subject: Re: Network card problems
>
>
> > Are you sure that you're on the same subnet as the router? The router and
> > machines should have the same netmask.
> >
> > microsoft dialogue
> >    This company has performed an illegal operation and will be shut down.
> >    If the problem persists, delete winblows and install linux
> >    close button
> >
> > On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Alex Snow wrote:
> >
> > > I just got rid of dhcp, and have assigned all computers on the network,
> > > including the linux box, ip addresses.  I reran netconfig and gave it
>the
> > > new ip address, netmask, and gateway.  Now when I type ifconfig I see
>the
> > > the net address is 192.168.1.101, that's what I assigned it.  Only
>problem
> > > is I still have no network support.  I can't ping the box, and I can't
> > > connect to my router using lynx.  Could there be some configuration on
>the
> > > card that is messed up? Someone suggested that I run isapnp, but the
>card
> > > seems to be detected fine.
> > > Explorer has caused a general protection fault in module kernel32.dll.
>I'm
> > > sick of Winblows!
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Adam Myrow" <amyrow at midsouth.rr.com>
> > > To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> > > Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 6:55 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Network card problems
> > >
> > >
> > > > If you can, tell us what happens during bootup with DHCP.  It should
>say
> > > > something like "attempting to configure eth0 by contacting a DHCP
>server."
> > > > Next, the DHCP command is supposed to report back what it gets.  If
>you
> > > > never see the "attempting to configure eth0" message, rerun netconfig
>and
> > > > make sure you selected DHCP.  DHCP is the second choice, static IP is
>the
> > > > first.  DHCP only asks if you need to supply a hostname, and most of
>us
> > > > don't.  It mentions that Cox at home is an exception where you need to
> > > > supply a hostname to DHCP.  Like I said, the card is definitely
> > > > functioning.  Good luck
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Speakup mailing list
> > > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Speakup mailing list
>Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
>http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup