Questions about programs under Linux.

[Janina Sajka]

Isn't it a bit irresponsible to offer up advice for which you cannot even 
offer a reason? You thought it should be so? On what basis did you think 
this?

Or, is "think" the wrong word here?

 On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Yvonne Smith 
wrote:

> Janina Sajka writes:
>  > On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Yvonne Smith wrote:
>  > > If you think you'll
>  > > be spending most of your time in emacs, then wouldn't emacspeak perhaps
>  > > be a better solution than speakup?
>  > 
>  > Why, for heaven's sake? Just because it has a similar name?? That would be 
>  > silly.
> 
> *sigh* no, that's not what I meant at all. Like I said, I'm in no
>  position to judge, since I've really never used emacs under speakup. I
>  merely thought if someone was going to spend a lot of time in emacs,
>  the interface that emacspeak uses might be easier to use. I didn't mean
>  it as a definite "you must use emacspeak" only as a "you should
>  possibly use emacspeak" if you were going to say spend 80% of your
>  computing time under emacs.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> 

-- 
	
				Janina Sajka, Director
				Technology Research and Development
				Governmental Relations Group
				American Foundation for the Blind (AFB)

Email: janina at afb.net		Phone: (202) 408-8175

Chair, Accessibility SIG
Open Electronic Book Forum (OEBF)
http://www.openebook.org