RH 6.2 Versus RH 7.2

[Richard Villa]

When you do a clean install of RH7.2, does the system use the ext 3 FS 
by default?

If not, is there a way to do a convertion without having to do a 
complete reinstall?

Richard
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Thomas Ward wrote:

> Well, I've noticed that slow down in spead myself. One way to help spead
> things up is to use the ext3 fs which works much better than ext2.
> One major difference between 6.2 and 7.2 is that 7.2 comes with the kudzu
> pnp hardware maniger. Kudzu tracks new and removed hardware, and attempts to
> configure it for you.
> A second change is the X-Windows server ois much newer, but on my 1.2 GHZ
> box the little drop in spead is worth getting all the new tools. At least
> for me.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Amanda Lee <amanda at shellworld.net>
> To: Speakup at Braille.Uwo.Ca <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:18 PM
> Subject: RH 6.2 Versus RH 7.2
> 
> 
> >
> > Hmmm I know that it is likely that RH 6.2 with Speakup enabled does not
> have
> > the most current version of Speakup patched into the Kernel but here's an
> > interesting comment from a friend whose judgement I respect a good deal.
> >
> > So to the other experts herein, please share your thoughts.
> >
> > He prefers RH 6.2 for the following reason:
> > RH 7.2 seems to be significantly slower, with lots more disk thrashing,
> and
> > it's
> > not just X Windows (although it's also significantly slower).
> >
> > So my question is...  What is enabled in RH 7.2 that you won't see in RH
> 6.2
> >
> > Amanda Lee
> > Alexandria, VA
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>