Raspberry Pi
Gregory Nowak
greg at gregn.net
Thu Mar 16 22:21:39 EDT 2017
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:30:57PM -0400, Kyle wrote:
> The Raspberry Pi3 is not really much better than the Pi2, because
> although it has a 64-bit processor, the software and kernel doesn't
> take advantage of the 64-bit optimizations, and the Debian flavor
> for the Raspberry Pi, known as Raspbian, is from all I've read, only
> built for earlier processors even than the Raspberry Pi 1, as it's
> apparently armv5 compatible, whereas the Pi2 is armv7 and the Pi3 is
> in reality aarch64.
While this is true for raspbian itself, there are in fact distros that
do have a kernel and userland built specifically for armhf/aarch64.
<https://news.opensuse.org/2016/12/05/opensuse-leap-42-2-gets-64-bit-raspberry-image/>
If you're into beta software, there's also:
<https://files.devuan.org/devuan_jessie_beta/embedded/>
The devuan beta is stable, and runs well on the rpi3 over all. There
are however some issues specific to the 64-bit image for the
rpi3. For a beginner, I'd recommend raspbian over the devuan beta at
this time. You can also of course install a tool chain on your PC,
and build a 64-bit kernel and userland yourself if you're up for
it. There's also the raging debate on raspbian's forums whether or
not a 64-bit distro for the rpi3 is worth it, given the 1G of RAM.
Greg
--
web site: http://www.gregn.net
gpg public key: http://www.gregn.net/pubkey.asc
skype: gregn1
(authorization required, add me to your contacts list first)
If we haven't been in touch before, e-mail me before adding me to your contacts.
--
Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org
More information about the Speakup
mailing list