supporting more than ttyS*

[Okash Khawaja]

> On 3 Jun 2017, at 15:16, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> 
> Okash Khawaja, on sam. 03 juin 2017 14:32:46 +0100, wrote:
>> This sounds great. /dev/lp* support should be straightforward. I am thinking of adding ttyS* and ttyUSB* in the first pass. And then add lp* afterwards as that may require testing. Let me know if that's okay.
> 
> I'd say directly implement lp* too, so people can test already. Since
> it's chosen by a kernel parameter, it's not a problem if it actually
> fails somehow, even the nastiest way.

Cool, sounds good