Line discipline

[Okash Khawaja]

Thanks. It seems relatively straightforward from here on. Job switch combined with an unexpectedly busy holiday period means that I haven't been able to work on this recently. Things will settle next week when I will be back on it. 

Merry Christmas and happy new year!

Okash

> On 20 Dec 2016, at 01:08, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> 
> Okash Khawaja, on Sun 18 Dec 2016 11:24:11 +0000, wrote:
>> Now I see three items to address, listed below in no particular order.
>> 
>> 1. Supplying major and minor dev numbers, instead of hardcoding.
> 
> This could be a mere module parameter string that a function turns into
> major/minor. Not a big deal :)
> 
>> 2. Integrating the changes into speakup_dummy and testing it.
> 
> Yep!
> 
>> 3. Strategy for kernel patch. Do we try to have it accepted? Not sure if there
>> is a standard way of addressing it.
> 
> It will never be accepted before step 2. is done.  In the end we'll want
> to get it accepted, sure, but we have to make speakup able to use it
> first, otherwise the kernel patch will be rejected.
> 
> Thanks!
> Samuel