looking for a "good" accessible linux distro

[Jason White]

Don Raikes  <speakup at linux-speakup.org> wrote:
>I appreciate all the suggestions.
>
>FYI: according to a blog post I read the arch packages are not signed, and
>even if they are pacman does not verify signatures when installing.

Be careful - that's outdated information. There was an article about this a
while ago (I think it was n LWN). All Arch packages are signed now as a matter
of policy.

I haven't used Arch but I just wanted to correct what you read in that blog
post.