speakup using different synths with software speech?

Willem van der Walt wvdwalt at csir.co.za
Sat Jun 6 11:29:07 EDT 2009


Espeak does also have an us english voice.


On Sat, 6 Jun 2009, Tony Baechler wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Actually, I like sox very much and I use it a lot for basic editing tasks.  I
> also generally prefer the command line.  My first talking computer was an
> Apple II+ with an Echo and a very old version of Textalker, so I can relate to
> poor speech quality.  However, the computer industry has progressed far beyond
> that point, even with hardware speech.  There's really no reason to use very
> low quality speech synthesizers anymore.  Note: I am not saying that ESpeak is
> very low quality.  It is better than the Echo, but I'm not sure how much
> better.  Part of the problem is that I am not in the UK and am not used to
> British voices.  It doesn't mispronounce things too badly and it does have a
> fairly low resource overhead.  With that said, I still don't see any reason
> why I should give up my expensive hardware synthesizers and why I should be
> forced into using non-free software speech.
> 
> Regarding audio editing, I'm not familiar with soundgrab.  I'll look at it.  I
> do like sox, but it isn't good for very precise editing tasks.  The command
> line is great, but when you're dealing with a very small amount of audio, such
> as 0.5 seconds, the command line just doesn't cut it.  I recently put together
> a presentation with music and clips from different audio files.  Sox did a
> great job, but there was a noticable lag between files.  I had to create a
> script with the commands to play each clip and it was obvious to me when one
> ended and the next started.  With something like Sound Forge, it would've been
> one smooth presentation with no gaps and no lag between clips.  I admit that
> I'm not a sox wizard and there are probably workarounds that I don't know
> about, but it took me much longer to get the command parameters exactly right
> since I couldn't easily cut and paste what I wanted.  It worked out well
> enough in the end though.
> 
> Georgina Joyce wrote:
> > Well here my LTLK works well on this debian lenny system with speakup.
> > I've no interest in using it with orca because I quite like espeak.
> > Because my first experience with a talking computere was with HAL and
> > the Apollo 1 synth and espeak is considerably better than that to my
> > ears.  However, I wanted to point out that quite a bit can be done via
> > the console in respect of audio editing.  Perhaps soundgrab and sox
> > doesn't attract you but they're a very powerful combination.  But I
> > accept that I'm happier on the commandline where as others are better
> > with a GUI.  
> >   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> 

-- 
This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, e-mail legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard. 
The full disclaimer details can be found at http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html.

This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, 
and is believed to be clean.  MailScanner thanks Transtec Computers for their support.




More information about the Speakup mailing list