apple's screen reader (was New Linux PDA For Blind People)

[David Poehlman]

...and growing...

On Mar 30, 2006, at 2:57 PM, W. Nick Dotson wrote:

What sound editing.  ProTools isn't as yet accessible with Tiger, and  
who wants to run OS9 and OutSpoken?  Again,
programs are only as accessible on a Mac as programmers choose to  
make them by adhering to the strictly volunteery
standards which make applications accessible to the not-Screen Reader.

Nick

On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:39:04 -0500, Travis Siegel wrote:

  What are you talking about?
  I use the mac every day. Email, file manipulation, cd/dvd playing, cd/
  dvd creating, online chatting, web browsing, word processing, and to
  some degree, even programming on the mac are completely 100%
  accessible.  There's folks using it for sound editing, and podcast
  creation as well.  If there's stuff you can't do on the mac, there's
  probably a third-party solution out there somewhere to do it.
  Admittedly, some of the programs aren't 100% accessible, but there's
  always workarounds.  The shell prompt (they call it terminal) works,
  though not automatically, but if that's the worst I have to worry
  about with a machine, then I'd say it's a pretty good machine.
  Also, the apple provided dvd player won't let you get to the video
  described sound tracks on your dvd by yourself, but the softcon DVD
  player does (http://softcon.com/mac). and there's other developers
  working on things like producing audio mp3 files from text using the
  apple voices, and various other little things to make macs easier/
  better to use.  I'd suggest going into your local apple store,
  sitting down with a mac, and trying it before insisting it's not
  usable.  I think you might be surprised at how much you can do with  
it.
  On Mar 30, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Ann K. Parsons wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Interesting point of view.  Not sure it's accurate, but definitely
> interesting.  <smiling>  It may even work, if, I say if, the
> mainstream market can be persuaded that it is just what is needed.
> Somebody in this discussion used the illustration of the typewriter.
> Good choice, why, because that device was, in the 1880s designed
> specifically *for* a blind person so that person could write more
> effectively.
>
> You may want to be careful when talking about Apple's screen reader.
> I have heard that it is good, but it doesn't give sull access yet.
> Perhaps there have been improvements?
>
> Ann P.
>
> -- 
> 			Ann K. Parsons
> email:  akp at eznet.net 			
> WEB SITE:  http://home.eznet.net/~akp
> Skype:  Putertutor
> "All that is gold does not glitter.
> Not all those who wander are lost."  JRRT
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>


  _______________________________________________
  Speakup mailing list
  Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
  http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup






_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup