greenwitch13 at adelphia.net
Thu Jun 15 13:21:19 EDT 2006
I personally prefer HTML as that is the format I know best and use easiest
with navigation and all, but keep in mind at this moment I'm still a Windows
user; looking to build a linux machine. My second choice would be the text
format. Just my two cents; for what it's worth. (smile)
Dual Stars Softworks
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Holmes" <steve at holmesgrown.com>
To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 12:58 PM
Subject: Online Documentation
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
> t curious.
> What format do you all like your online electronic documentation in? I
> mean as choices plain text, HTML, postscript, PDF, info (compiled from
> teXinfo), man pages, etc.
> I'm asking this partly because I'm fixin' to build some Slackware based
> packages for Exim and others and have a choice as to what kind of
> documentation to include. In particular, Exim has I think four
> different formats available for their documentation and would be added
> separately when installed. I really don't wanna bloat the package with
> four different formats so hence my question. I'm personally torn
> between HTML and info. The HTML versions are easiest to include where
> info, you have to be careful with the global dir file.
> Anyway, I just thought I'd ask to get other people's ideas on this
> subject. I have a Slackware compatible package for Exim 4.62 ready to
> go as soon as I work out the manual preference. I could actually leave
> it as is with their plain text format and let the end user fetch the
> other formats on their own. I will also have Slack packages for Speech
> Dispatcher and Speechd-up available shortly.
> - --
> HolmesGrown Solutions
> The best solutions for the best price!
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
More information about the Speakup