The Fedora duck that thought it was a...? (was RE: Speakup Modified Fedora 4 Will Be Delayed)

[Janina Sajka]

I have told you all I know, and all I really care to know about Fedora
numbering. As I said in my last message, I really don't give a damm
about the subject.

My only interest, as I said in the first instance, is that the
information posted regarding the Speakup Modified is accurate and reliable. I
will not hesitate to respond forcefully on that account, and I also
don't care whether you regard my response as aggressive or whatever.

Adrian Beech writes:
> G'day,
> 
> Okay I'm probably adding fuel to the fire... I'm fairly new to the FC
> variant and have been mildly baffled by the the naming conventione employed
> by the keepers of the code base and I'd really like a much more definitive
> explaination, if possible, as to when a duck is not a duck.  Surely Janina
> if you know the answers which support the reasonings then perhaps you could
> enlighten us all instead of, ummmmm, hmmmmm, ummmmm... being (and don't take
> this the wrong way) aggressive in your tone and attitude.  If you don't know
> the where and why fores just say so, huh?
> 
> My sincere apologies to all if this response is seen as to be inflammatory
> in nature.  It is not my intention to persist the present tones which seem
> to be evolving from this thread.  I too merely seek a response that makes
> sense and is one that I can understand.