Linux and data storage?

[Sina Bahram]

Thank you for that ever so polite answer Janina *smile*

You are, as always, as helpful as ever.

Have a nice day.

Take care,
Sina

No trees were destroyed in sending this message; however, a large number of
electrons were terribly inconvenienced. 
-----Original Message-----
From: speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca [mailto:speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca]
On Behalf Of Janina Sajka
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 2:15 PM
To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
Subject: Re: Linux and data storage?

What do you mean "Is there a Linux equivalent?"

Have you forgotten where networking was invented? It certainly wasn't
invented on Windows, Sina. Sheesh. What a question.

This is trivial on Linux. We've done it for years. There are several ways to
accomplish it.

Get a clue.

Sina Bahram writes:
> If I may humbly suggest?
> 
> Fxp, or flash xp as I think it is...is a windows tool that allows 
> someone to connect to one ftp, then connect to the other ftp...and 
> then say, FTP A, copy stuff to FTP B....then all you have to do is sit 
> back and let the data packets flow...it doesn't go through your system 
> at all: so you could transfer information at any speed, only limited 
> by the two ftp servers, not by your own connection.
> 
> *shrug* is there a linux equivalent to this tool/protocall?
> 
> Take care,
> Sina
> 
> No trees were destroyed in sending this message; however, a large 
> number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca 
> [mailto:speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca]
> On Behalf Of Chuck Hallenbeck
> Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 8:51 PM
> To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
> Subject: Re: Linux and data storage?
> 
> Karen,
> 
> You have two bottlenecks, seems to me. One is your connection speed, 
> the other is nettamer. You can use "tar" on your ISP's system to 
> aggregate those precious files into one archive, assuming you have the 
> space, and then move that archive somewhere. Nettamer could retrieve 
> it with its ftp facility, but it might take forever over a dialup link.
> 
> If you had a linux desktop, you could use an ftp client on your 
> desktop, call it "system A", to move files from "system B" to "system 
> C", assuming you had the necessary access permissions and such.
> 
> Also, you could email stuff to yourself with attachments, although 
> nettamer is a little weird about attachments, and then you have filesize
limits.
> 
> Finally, if you had a Linux desktop and a high speed connection you 
> would be home free. Just grab all those files quickly with an FTP 
> client, move them to your desktop, and burn them to a CD if you need to.
> 
> My Linux system uses two 40 GB disks, one of which is used extensively 
> to backup stuff on the other. Not exactly a raid system, but heavily
redundant.
> I do use CD backups too once in a blue moon.
> 
> Your DOS desktop has limited HD storage. A Linux desktop would not. I 
> have a DOS partition of 500 MB on each of my two 40 GB hard discs, 
> just in case, but have not booted into DOS in several years. For my 
> own situation, I cannot imagine ever being able (psychologically) to 
> return to DOS and Nettamer.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup

-- 
	
				Janina Sajka, Chair
				Accessibility Workgroup
				Free Standards Group (FSG)

janina at freestandards.org	Phone: +1 202.494.7040


_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup