Testing PGP on List

[Igor Gueths]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hmm. I tried the <escape>P command and then tried re-opening the message 
to see if the signature would verify...I havne't actually gotten 
anyone's signature to propperly verify. Gpg gives me a message that 
states that the signature could not be verified, that the public key was 
not found. However, before that Mutt tells me that a certain was not 
found...From the way Dectalk pronounces it, I am guessing the program is 
called gpgswrap or something like that. Anyone know what I am missing 
here? Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 07:31:53AM -0700, Steve Holmes wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:58:06PM -0600, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> > Looks good, and your key imported just fine. From what I understand,
> > it is a good idea to use the traditional signatures anyway, since some
> > mailers don't support the newer pgp/mime format from what I've been
> > told.
> 
> From the language of what I've read so far, it sounds like these other
> mailers better get hoppin! When I see phrases like "strongly
> deprecated" and the like, it makes me think that inline signatures are
> rather undesirable and should only be used when nothing else works.  I
> set the 'quad option' of the pgp_create_traditional variable to ask-no
> so I get prompted each time and can answer 'y' for the lists but use
> the other default for private stuff.
> 
> -- 
> HolmesGrown Solutions
> The best solutions for the best price!
> http://ld.net/?holmesgrown
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAYxuBNohoaf1zXJMRAvNnAJ0ZHnDpIdBGh4ZNmUsZWDmXkIStSQCeLcIh
xLse7MqZ+YCq0QTDR2X8bJI=
=qdJx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----