Testing PGP on List

[Steve Holmes]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:58:06PM -0600, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> Looks good, and your key imported just fine. From what I understand,
> it is a good idea to use the traditional signatures anyway, since some
> mailers don't support the newer pgp/mime format from what I've been
> told.

- From the language of what I've read so far, it sounds like these other
mailers better get hoppin! When I see phrases like "strongly
deprecated" and the like, it makes me think that inline signatures are
rather undesirable and should only be used when nothing else works.  I
set the 'quad option' of the pgp_create_traditional variable to ask-no
so I get prompted each time and can answer 'y' for the lists but use
the other default for private stuff.

- -- 
HolmesGrown Solutions
The best solutions for the best price!
http://ld.net/?holmesgrown
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAYu1WWSjv55S0LfERAlO4AKDKqStC3zMbrQ5KDkm6+yFKgEJcQgCg8SZx
Jf6e5JQrxmeJoAJlgN1rk4g=
=Cvzn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----