pgp problem still not solved

[Chuck Hallenbeck]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Igor,

>From a message on the gnupg users list:
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

HTH
Chuck


On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Igor Gueths wrote:

> Hi all. My problem with Mutt/inline PGP signatures remains unsolved.
> Shaun Oliver and I traded configs and didn't get anywhere, except to
> learn the fact that our configurations perfectly matched in terms of
> commands being passed to gpg. I tried downgrading from Mutt-1.4.2 to
> Mutt-1.3.28I and still got the same results. Could the version of Gnupg
> that I'm using have something to do with the problem? I've been
> currently using Gnupg-1.2.2, and I've read everywhere in the Mutt docs
> that the old-style PGP signatures i.e., SHA1 are strongly deprecated.
> Does anyone have any other ideas regarding this, or am I pretty much
> correct in my assumptions? Because considering I am doing everything
> right, I'm running out of possibilities as to what the problem is.
> Thanks!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>

- -- 
The Moon is Waning Crescent (40% of Full)
In a world without Fences or Walls no one needs Windows or Gates.
My home page is now at http://www.mhcable.com/~chuckh
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBQC36KjVdG8M9x9tGAQJNpwP/dyB2D9wdpO3H5btYLsrV1rHj5bhzXZ5A
utL9coIL58JvIQuNOxLLw63ISCGdPSu2ktyIKKKZyy3HlBxjmRd2/xBMxFnph9Qg
Rhf6LS4/wzwkNC9n7sKgiyaMhLkUzKeaHpDDVkGI7XIqHDfkusm+FcFIO6zafFK4
r641ZT0HBuA=
=NWzb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----