Gnoppernicus and remote?

[Sina Bahram]

I'd be really interested actually.

Thank you Alex.

Take care,
Sina 

No trees were destroyed in sending this message; however, a large number of
electrons were terribly inconvenienced. 
-----Original Message-----
From: speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca [mailto:speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca]
On Behalf Of Alex Snow
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:53 PM
To: Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
Subject: Re: Gnoppernicus and remote?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

the soundcard thing can be fixed by installing a network sound daemon...If
you want I can look up that particular piece of software.
On
Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 05:47:34PM -0500, Kenny Hitt wrote:
> Hi.  I only played with this once for a few minutes.  I used XDMCP 
> instead of ssh.  Doing it this way meant the only thing running om my 
> work station was the X server.  All other apps including gnopernicus 
> ran on the other system.  Gnopernicus used the other system's sound 
> card instead of my work station's sound card.  This should be expected.
> WARNING!  XDMCP isn't secure.  I did this on my local network and made 
> sure nothing could se the XDMCP ports from the internet.
> 
> I haven't tried using ssh, but you will probably need to have 
> Gnopernicus running on your work station to get it working.  Start an 
> X session on the local box with Gnopernicus, metacity, and a gnome 
> terminal.  In the gnome terminal, ssh to the other box and start a 
> gnome session.  This way, Gnopernicus will speak on your local work 
> station and the gnome session will run on the remote box.
> 
> Try playing with it and let us know what happens.
>           Kenny
> 	  
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 05:55:23PM -0400, Sina Bahram wrote:
> > So I could pipe both the sound from and the x session itself, over SSH?
> > 
> > Wouldn't there then be some lag in gnoppernicus's output?
> > 
> > I believe what WinEyes, and soon to be Jaws, does is send the text 
> > to be spoken over the network, and then let the client speak 
> > it....this way we're just sending little packets of ascii, which can
fly.
> > 
> > If I have to pipe the actual sound from gnoppernicus, I'm thinking 
> > there will be some serious lag?
> > 
> > Take care,
> > Sina
> > 
> > No trees were destroyed in sending this message; however, a large 
> > number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.