*****SPAM***** My apology

[kevin]

All I meant was that a Linux box works best when dealing with handling data
packits over a network and this product will allow the blind user to send
and recieve *shutter* windows files across a network (office to office for
instance) if need be.
I understand how you my think I am full of it, after all, such words may be
hard to grasp.  However, I say
that if you give this release a chance, the concept will catch on.  I don't
mean to waste anyone's time, I simply ask that you keep an opend-mind.
After all, isn't this what open-source is all about?
Kevin
email:
kjsisco at rcn.com

 a Linux box was mean
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Howell" <showell at lrxms.net>
To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: *****SPAM***** My apology


> Kevin,
>
> I read the documentation you sent to the list. First I'm incredibly
> confused by what you wrote. Why are you even attempting to marrie
> windows and alsa. I assume you are attempting to draw some parallel, but
> I miss the entire point. Alsa has nothing and I mean nothing to do with
> speech in any form you could possibly dream up. Alsa is modules to make
> sound from sound cards and that's the simplest thing I can think to say
> on that note.
> You further more write and I quote from the documentation:
> "I would first like to make one thing clear: alsa has nothing to do
>    with Jaws for Windows!"
>
> Yes yes you got that right on the money!
> " However, be that as it may, the
> kernal allows
>    for such alterations because it was designed to be networked to a
>    Windows machine."
>
> Ok what the hell do you meanthat ALsa was ment to be networked to a
> windows machine or the Linux kernel. SUrely you don't mean the Linux
> kernel as how is a kernel going to be networked to a windows machine and
> what fruitloop would even do such a rediculous thing. Not to mention
> that if you ment Linux is to be networked to windows, its the other way
> around. Windows is barely networkible to itself let along anything else.
>
> The point is Kevin that you haven't answered the qestuions we asked,
> you've not proven anything, you must be mad, and surely you can't expect
> anyone to take this load of shit seriously. I mean I'm trying like hell
> to be reasonable, but I can't help post this message because your
> attempt at documenting this tool just doesn't make sense. I'm not the
> sharpest tool in the shed, but I can see this stuff you wrote is just
> rediculous. Look the fact of the matter is you are making a fool of
> yourself and surely that's not your intention.
> Whatelse is there to say? I've tried racking my brain to come up with
> something that might make some sense, but I just can't think of it. If
> this was some module or something in the kernel that was tied to the
> video, maybe I could find something, but it just doesn't fly in any form
> you've presented it.
>
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>