Actiontech router?

Luke Davis ldavis at shellworld.net
Mon Jul 7 00:53:19 EDT 2003


Try one of the later pres, such as 11.  The support, I believe, was better
in 9 on out.


On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Steve Holmes wrote:

> I'm using version 2.1pre7 and yes, the java support was specified when
> I compiled from the tar ball source.  I don't remember the exact
> options now but I also enabled the related stuff in the configuration
> for the run time of the browser.  Maybe it works on certain pages but
> for me I have had almost zero success.  I sometimes like the layout it
> does and I also like the frames being shown all at once but javascript
> well.... I think that will have to wait before it is useful for me.
>
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 11:49:36AM -0500, Luke Davis wrote:
> > Note: I speak only of the chain and its varients, in this message...
> >
> > Are you sure you weren't using elinks?  Under Debian, for example,
> > installing "links", will get you "elinks", which is a branch of the main
> > links package, with no JS support.
> >
> > I have used links with success on many javascript sites.
> >
> > It can not handle non SDM scripts, so it's mainly good for JS forms,
> > links, buttons, and option lists, but for those things, it does in fact
> > work.
> >
> > When did you do this test, and what was the version you used?  You have to
> > be using a pre.
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Steve Holmes wrote:
> >
> > > Interesting you mention the "Chain."  I tried that program (most
> > > recent version) and frankly I've yet to find a javascript page that
> > > worked right.  At least the ones I had any particular interest in.  I
> > > neddless to say, was very disappointed in the current level of
> > > javascript support for that browser.  I had tried it on a couple
> > > financial sites I have access to and this php database application I
> > > downloaded and setup all fell on their faces.  This php tool had a
> > > section that simply came up blank.  So If I ever wanna use that level
> > > of javascript support, I will probably have to wait for Mozilla and
> > > Gnopernicus to grow up or pop over to internet exploder for the time
> > > being <sigh>.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 01:59:26PM -0400, Janina Sajka wrote:
> > > > You don't need javascript to navigate a tree. There's no linkage between
> > > > the two necessarily.
> > > >
> > > > Nor are you prevented from pages that use js on the console. Go get the
> > > > chain, if you need that.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>




More information about the Speakup mailing list