redhat problems

[Nick Gawronski]

Hi, do you think that speakup will be in the next version of redhat?  
bye On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, Thomas D. Ward wrote:

> Hi, you must understand the removal of speakup was strictly technical by
> nature. Allot of the people on list are out to get Red Hat for pulling
> speakup when there are technical issues that need and should be resolved.
> One technical issue I agree with Red Hat on is a moduler version of speakup
> as rather than the current way speakup is compiled into the kernel direct.
> If I had the time and patients to do so I would do so myself, but it really
> is a big undertaking to modulerize speakup.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Nick Gawronski <nick at nickgawronski.com>
> To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 5:25 PM
> Subject: redhat problems
> 
> 
> >       Hi, We must do something about all of these problems with redhat.
> > Think about it, rh8 had speakup and it was working just fine but look what
> > has happend rh9 is here and we don't have speakup yet the
> > readme-accessibility file is in 9 that says that redhat wants to make
> > their products accessible.  Well, I don't think that they are beeing very
> > nice about this at all.  If they removed speakup they should of removed
> > readme-accessbility as well.  We must contact redhat and find out "why did
> > you remove speakup yet leave readme-accessibility"  That is what we need
> > to do about this.  Who says they have a right to put speakup in one
> > version then take it away.  Think about this because we can make them put
> > it back in to their product.  bye
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>