dns problem

[Scott Howell]

I wonder in the short term if there is a way to account for both machine 
names so I'll not get bit in the process of changing names. I think the 
mistake is naming the machine the same name as the domain. I guess 
there's no point in naming your box example if your domain is 
example.com being as it'll show up as example.example.com which seems 
silly in any case.<grin>
I didn't think of this when I started. What is interesting though is why 
it wouldn't do lookups beyond my own domain. That I think bothers me 
more being as if it would have done lookups at least I couldn't have 
worked with the situation. I obviously dont' know dns as well as I'd 
like, but perhaps this could have something to do with the reverse 
lookups? Seems as long as my dns server can contact a root server it 
should still produce dns results.
I guess this is also punishment for not keeping my old box updated. Most 
the software on it is from Slackware 7.1 and its worked well enough. My 
mistake was trying to build a Debian box and I've not had to concern 
myself with setting up Debian as a server or firewall box so I imagine 
perhaps there's some differences or unique aspecs I overlooked, but 
didn't think so.

tnx

Actually one other interesting point is that ns1.lrxms.net resolves back 
to lrxms.lrxms.net per the zone file. I didn't think because ns1 was 
another name for the primary dns server, would it matter what the 
machine's real name is.

tnx

On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 11:43:25AM -0500, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> Yeah, if your isp or whoever you registered your domain with, knows your ns1 machine by one name, and you decide to give your ns1 another name without telling them, you're going to have problems. Either contact your isp and whoever you registered your domain with, and give them the new name for ns1, or make your new server have your old server's name.
> 
> I never saw the advantage of naming your dns servers as ns1.domain.com, but I think I do now (smile).
> 
> Greg