8.0 problems.

[Gregory Nowak]

Emacs speak has a higher learning curve then speakup does. I was able to start using speakup fairly well after only 45 minutes or so. 
On the other hand, I tried emacs speak for about 2 weeks, and didn't even really master all the basics.

Greg


On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 08:26:53PM -0400, Tommy Moore wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 05:23:41PM -0700, Bear in SFO wrote:
> > 
> > They do have EmacsSpeak don't they?!  At least that's what I was told at 
> > Linux World 2002...
> 
> Ok, so now we're talking about people not knowing what the differences between Speakup and emacspeak are as far as how they work?
> That's like saying that only one mail program should be included like pine or mutt and just only that one.
> Yes Speakup and Emacspeak are different but they both have their strengths and weaknesses. I don't have any experience with Emacspeak, but from what I've been told you cna basically do all the things with Emacspeak that you can with Speakup except for the installation of the box.
> I haven't done this yet but I will be using Emacspeak soon on my laptop becuase I don't want to lug the synth around with me when I'm on the go so will be using that on the laptop with software speech.
> So both programs are good nad have their uses and both should stay in the distribution.
> 
> Tommy
> 
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup