xwindows

[jwantz at hpcc2.hpcc.noaa.gov]

Hi,
Well, there isn't anything to prevent someone re-writing lynx in such a 
way that it would function the same as internet explorer in WINDOWS.  
Except that it would be a lot of work of course.  I agree, Internet 
Exploder will access more things than lynx.  We can only hope that 
Netscrape will work better under Gnome than it does under WINDOWS.

     Jim Wantz WB0TFK
On Tue, 
14 May 2002, Cheryl Homiak wrote:

> Also, you have to remember that just because we have access to a gui doesn't
> mean it's going to be easy. How many times have i heard blind windowws users
> complain that they did something but can't undo it or duplicate it because
> they're not sure how they did it in the first place. Having a screen reader that
> really allows you to sort out where you are and what you are changing or are
> about to change would be vital.
> My biggest concern for linux right now isn't gui per se; my biggest concern is
> Internet accessibility. My main reason for being interested in Xwindows at all
> is the hope of being able eventually to use a browser that will allow me to
> access Internet sites that I cannot now access. I don't know if that is a
> realistic hope, but that is frankly my main concern.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>