RH 6.2 Versus RH 7.2

[Mitchell]

yes, you can convert an existing system. 

First make sure you have ext3 fs support in your kernel


cat /proc/filesystems 

you should see

extention 3 fs


if that is the case you can convert your filesystems by doing the following.

1. unmount the filesystem if possible

2. tunefs -j /dev/hda5

replacing hda5 with the device your filesystem is actually on. 

4. edit /etc/fstab and find the entry for that filesystem, change the 3rd field "ext2" to "ext3" and save the file


5. remount the filesystem 

and your done. 

For this reason  ext3 is a much easyer filesystem to migrate too rather than something like reiserfs or XFS. 

however I must say I have had much better performance results from the SGI, XFS filesystem than ext3, but yes it's not as 
easy to convert to. 

Hope this helps.

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 04:40:20AM -0600, Richard Villa wrote:
> When you do a clean install of RH7.2, does the system use the ext 3 FS 
> by default?
> 
> If not, is there a way to do a convertion without having to do a 
> complete reinstall?
> 
> Richard
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Thomas Ward wrote:
> 
> > Well, I've noticed that slow down in spead myself. One way to help spead
> > things up is to use the ext3 fs which works much better than ext2.
> > One major difference between 6.2 and 7.2 is that 7.2 comes with the kudzu
> > pnp hardware maniger. Kudzu tracks new and removed hardware, and attempts to
> > configure it for you.
> > A second change is the X-Windows server ois much newer, but on my 1.2 GHZ
> > box the little drop in spead is worth getting all the new tools. At least
> > for me.
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Amanda Lee <amanda at shellworld.net>
> > To: Speakup at Braille.Uwo.Ca <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:18 PM
> > Subject: RH 6.2 Versus RH 7.2
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > Hmmm I know that it is likely that RH 6.2 with Speakup enabled does not
> > have
> > > the most current version of Speakup patched into the Kernel but here's an
> > > interesting comment from a friend whose judgement I respect a good deal.
> > >
> > > So to the other experts herein, please share your thoughts.
> > >
> > > He prefers RH 6.2 for the following reason:
> > > RH 7.2 seems to be significantly slower, with lots more disk thrashing,
> > and
> > > it's
> > > not just X Windows (although it's also significantly slower).
> > >
> > > So my question is...  What is enabled in RH 7.2 that you won't see in RH
> > 6.2
> > >
> > > Amanda Lee
> > > Alexandria, VA
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>