Hewlet Packard and Linux

Mon Aug 27 17:57:32 EDT 2001

Shaun,

         Before I installed Linux on my laptop, i had the same question in 
my head.  Will there be any possible chance that I can install Windows 
applications under my Linux machine.  The answer is yes.  You can install 
windows applications under linux.  I'm not sure exactly how to do it, but i 
do know that you need a Windows emulator called VM Ware.

         Now, the person you should speak to about this is Janina, she 
explained this to me before.

         From my understanding about this Windows eumlator, it basically 
turns Linux into windows, and allows you to install any windows 
applications or drivers.

         At the moment, i installed Linux on my brand new Toshiba 
laptop.  I am running Linux on  a dual boot on this laptop, because 
I  wasn't sure if my drivers or hardare rather would be compatible at 
all...  I heard a lot of good things about linux, and if i learn how to use 
it, i am thinking of switching from Windows to linux on this machine.  And 
I have other 2 machines at home and work, which the one at work I am 
thinking of backing up my information and formatting the drive clean and 
isntalling Linux as the only operating syste.  And I will also do that on 
one of the systems at home.

I will keep a Windows machine just in case.  But i have a feeling that 
linux will become my new favorite operating system other then dos.

--- Peter

At 11:28 PM 8/25/01 +1000, you wrote:
>I've been following this thread for a while. and haven't decided to say
>something until now.
>I'm of the oppinion that linux as an operating system accessable to the
>blind, is streets ahead of it's comercial counterparts.
>I say this because as a user of both operating systems, I can see the place
>for both of them. I find that windows in a normal office environment is a
>very powerful tool indeed. However, if I could have the power of linux and
>the ease of use of windows all rolled into one, I'd be a very happy camper.
>I mean I'd like the nice frilly bits of microsoft word and excell and all
>that but right at the moment, I haven't seen gpl console versions of either.
>Linux is a great workhorse especially if you want to run it as a server box
>or as a firewall, but I want the durrability of linux with the ease of use
>of windows but I guess for now I'll just have to learn how to use linux to
>it's full potential.
>Don't get me wrong here, I'm not complaining, just stating how I feel on the
>whole issue.
>Shaun..
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>Make Unlimited phone calls from your PC to ANY phone in the World!
>http://www.eboom.com/free/
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Charles Hallenbeck" <chuckh at mhonline.net>
>To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
>Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 10:59 PM
>Subject: Re: Hewlet Packard and Linux
>
>
> > Charlie and all -
> >
> > Your remarks about DOS are interesting - I was a DOS fan too and actually
> > never moved to Windows, except to support my Arkenstone Open Book Unbound
> > software. My machine is presently a dual boot machine so I can se Linux to
> > get work done or else at boot time select DOS (I use the Caldera
> > OpenDOS) to use my scanner software and one or two other legacy apps.
> >
> > If you remember when DOS was introduced in the early 80s, version 1.X was
> > a lot like CP/M; as it was revised to 2.X and then 3.X, it gradually
> > became a lot more like Unix than CP/M, with a hierarchical file system,
> > batch files, and then later versions even had online help.
> >
> > Now that should tell you something: namely, that Unix was a mature
> > standard for text consoles even in the early 80s when DOS was being forged
> > in Redmond. Linux of course is an Open Source and contemporary
> > implementation of Unix, and is therefore a decade ahead of the game
> > compared to DOS.
> >
> > Linux is also a fundamentally dual personality system, with its GUI being
> > a robust add-on to the underlying text based console system.
> >
> > Linux was created as Open Source on the internet and is maintained and
> > developed there. It is a fundamental mistake to think of it in the same
> > market terms as the other major OS. Of course there is no market for Linux
> > accessibility solutions. But there are users and there is need, and that
> > need is being met by and large without benefit of market concepts.
> >
> > How do people make a living in the Open Source world? By selling services,
> > not products. Products in the Open Source world are organic things. They
> > take root, they grow, they live or die on their merits, and they both give
> > to and take from their users. There would be no Speakup if it were
> > conceived on a marketing model of accessibility solutions,  trust me on
> > that one.
> >
> > So - don't worry about Linux, it is in there for the long haul.
> >
> > I was recently tempted to spring for a preinstalled Linux system when I
> > last upgraded, but opted for the "rolling my own" solution. I am convinced
> > that if I had plunked down for a package deal I would have ended up
> > overhauling it anyway.
> >
> > Will Linux ever be a mass market product suitable for the people who check
> > their email once a week and want their machine to do what they want, and
> > not what they say? Probably not. There may always be a niche for a
> > Windows-type OS with its closely guarded secrets and predatory practices,
> > with all the insides protected from meddling users and all the decision
> > details already made for them.
> >
> > Best regards - and welcome to the list!
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >
> > Visit me at http://www.mhonline.net/~chuckh
> > The Moon is Waxing Crescent (46% of Full)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Speakup mailing list
>Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
>http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup