Which hardware synthesizer to buy?

al Sten-Clanton Albert.E.Sten_Clanton at verizon.net
Mon Apr 13 11:55:29 EDT 2009


"Even with a hardware synth we have nowhere near a power-up to shutdown
solution like we used to have.  From that perspective speakup is a very sad
distant relation to it's earlier self.  If we were to go back and include
that capability we would probably lose the in-roads we've made into being
made available on many distributions and tolerance to the linux kernel
community."

What's with these kernel geeks?  Is there some legitimate technical reason
why this is true, or is this entirely or mostly a case of inflexible but
largely arbitrary design standards?  Most people here know that there have
been several speakup-modified versions of Fedora, though, sadly, not created
by the Fedora folks in the ordinary course of their work.  GRML had speakup
available early in the boot process for some time, and apparently will
again.  Slackware's had a speakup-modified kernel for a while, it seems.  I
gather that Ubuntu once had speakup, and that Gentoo had it and may have it
now.  Does anybody here know what the *real* deal is with not making it a
regular part of the kernel, as visual access and a great many things are?  

Yes, I know these issues have been raised here before, but I don't think
anybody from anywhere has made a technical case that speakup is somehow
fundamentally different from the great number of things that the kernel has
come to include one way or another.  So far, it seems to me that the real
argument is "We don't want to.  You blinks don't count that much."

Is this all or mostly wrong?  If so, is there something I can read that will
explain why, something in plain enough English that a person who knows
little about the kernel can understand?  

I want it clear that I appreciate greatly the work some people are doing to
make speakup more available, like the Debian folks and Chris Brannon.  Of
course, I've long been grateful for Bill Acker's and Janina Sajka's work,
which gave me my path into Linux.  I understand Kirk's comment quoted above
to suggest that the speakup that is being made more available has
limitations that earlier version didn't have, though, and that the fault
lies where the kernel buck stops.  If I'm wrong, please correct my
information; if I'm right, then the next turkey we cook in this house will
be named Kernel Bummer or something.

Al




More information about the Speakup mailing list