apple's screen reader (was New Linux PDA For Blind People)

[BlindTech of BlindTechs.Net]

Nick, your such a mac hater. but have youu heard of audacity?
BlindTech of BlindTechs.Net
blindtech at blindtechs.net
website: http://blindtechs.net
Visit our website where we offer free email, shell accoiunts,  
shoutcast radio service, online games and more!
Powered by Unix not Microsoft


On Mar 30, 2006, at 12:57 PM, W. Nick Dotson wrote:

> What sound editing.  ProTools isn't as yet accessible with Tiger,  
> and who wants to run OS9 and OutSpoken?  Again,
> programs are only as accessible on a Mac as programmers choose to  
> make them by adhering to the strictly volunteery
> standards which make applications accessible to the not-Screen Reader.
>
> Nick
>
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:39:04 -0500, Travis Siegel wrote:
>
>  What are you talking about?
>  I use the mac every day. Email, file manipulation, cd/dvd playing,  
> cd/
>  dvd creating, online chatting, web browsing, word processing, and to
>  some degree, even programming on the mac are completely 100%
>  accessible.  There's folks using it for sound editing, and podcast
>  creation as well.  If there's stuff you can't do on the mac, there's
>  probably a third-party solution out there somewhere to do it.
>  Admittedly, some of the programs aren't 100% accessible, but there's
>  always workarounds.  The shell prompt (they call it terminal) works,
>  though not automatically, but if that's the worst I have to worry
>  about with a machine, then I'd say it's a pretty good machine.
>  Also, the apple provided dvd player won't let you get to the video
>  described sound tracks on your dvd by yourself, but the softcon DVD
>  player does (http://softcon.com/mac). and there's other developers
>  working on things like producing audio mp3 files from text using the
>  apple voices, and various other little things to make macs easier/
>  better to use.  I'd suggest going into your local apple store,
>  sitting down with a mac, and trying it before insisting it's not
>  usable.  I think you might be surprised at how much you can do  
> with it.
>  On Mar 30, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Ann K. Parsons wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Interesting point of view.  Not sure it's accurate, but definitely
>> interesting.  <smiling>  It may even work, if, I say if, the
>> mainstream market can be persuaded that it is just what is needed.
>> Somebody in this discussion used the illustration of the typewriter.
>> Good choice, why, because that device was, in the 1880s designed
>> specifically *for* a blind person so that person could write more
>> effectively.
>>
>> You may want to be careful when talking about Apple's screen reader.
>> I have heard that it is good, but it doesn't give sull access yet.
>> Perhaps there have been improvements?
>>
>> Ann P.
>>
>> -- 
>> 			Ann K. Parsons
>> email:  akp at eznet.net 			
>> WEB SITE:  http://home.eznet.net/~akp
>> Skype:  Putertutor
>> "All that is gold does not glitter.
>> Not all those who wander are lost."  JRRT
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Speakup mailing list
>> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
>> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>>
>>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Speakup mailing list
>  Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
>  http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup