off topic: accessibility with mac stuff?

[Steve Holmes]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Does this mean that Coco apps can never be ported to or run in Windows?
If so then Mac users will never have Voice-Over access to the MS office
apps either, will they.  BTW, the windows port of Itunes is dispicable!
It is one of the most inaccessible programs I've seen.  Even with my
Window-Eyes set files, it is very dificult to use.  And furthermore,
Apple apparently has no intentions to support a linux port of itunes.

What little I saw of Voice-Over, I was impressed with the native
environment but it would appear there is a lot of stuff that still won't
work with it.  I still prefer the non proprietary implementation of
Speakup and the Linux kernel.

On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 12:24:33PM -0400, David Poehlman wrote:
> actually, ITunes is quite usable but to et picky about it, ITunes is  
> used mainly by windows users so apple code it that way so that they  
> can use it.  PUt it in coco and you loose windows users.
> 
> -- 
> Jonnie Apple Seed
> With his:
> Hands-On Technolog(eye)s


- -- 
HolmesGrown Solutions
The best solutions for the best price!
http://ld.net/?holmesgrown
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDXWgBWSjv55S0LfERA0AgAKDaTGGyb6UMeOkDR1EAkyI8FFCckQCghYBG
hmsxuTPNa0m1At2bYbt6oYU=
=nutN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----