boosting responsiveness of accent pc

Ralph W. Reid rreid at sunset.net
Fri Nov 26 13:05:23 EST 2004


I have noticed the delay with the Accent PC (internal ISA card) on my
old Pentium 133 MHZ system running Slackware (currently version 10.0),
but have not found it to be objectionable.  This is the only speech
synthesizer I have run on Linux though, so perhaps I am simply used to
it???  I actually had to play around with the sample line of text you
provided (shortening it and adding additional text to it) to really
notice the delay--the delay does seem to get longer with longer lines
of text here as well.  HTH, and have a _great_ day.

On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 09:06:02PM -0600, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi all.
> 
> Is it just me, or is the accent pc sluggish when used with speakup?
> What I mean is the longer the string the accent pc has to speak, the
> more of a delay there is before the string is spoken. Here is an
> illustration of what I'm talking about.
> 
> Say for example you type the string:
> 
> "This is a rather longish test sentence."
> 
> on a blank line without the quotes. If you then use the numpad-8 key to
> read the line with speakup, there is a delay of almost one second
> between when the read line key is pressed, and when the accent pc
> actually starts to speak the sentence. On the other hand, if I type
> the same phrase on a blank line using a doubletalk pc, the doubletalk
> pc speaks the phrase immediately when the read line key is pressed.
> 
> I suspect, though am not positive, that this is a speakup-specific
> issue, since I don't have this delay when using window-eyes or provox
> with the accent pc. This behavior holds true for speakup 1.5, and cvs
> speakup, so this is not something that was introduced recently. In
> fact, I have noticed this issue since I got my accent pc about a year
> and a half ago, but didn't comment on it until now, since I couldn't
> think of a clear way to describe the problem. 
> 
> I do remember that playing with delay_time and jiffy_delta was
> suggested on here before to improve synth responsiveness, however, as
> I recall, this suggestion was made only if one uses the stock
> redhat/fedora kernel, and I am using my own kernel build from the
> vanilla kernel.org source tarball.
> 
> Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks.
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
> - -- 
> Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFBpp2a7s9z/XlyUyARAuXSAKCBp/PhkV3iSXH/J/o+UO2f109e4QCgt/Zk
> RKPXyBS2iHRyjprARU1k130=
> =pqed
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Ralph.  N6BNO.  Wisdom comes from central processing, not from I/O.
rreid at sunset.net  http://personalweb.sunset.net/~rreid
Opinions herein are either mine or they are flame bait.
COSECANT (x) = COTAN (x) / TAN (x)




More information about the Speakup mailing list