gpg test, and a question
Shane Wegner
shane-keyword-speakup.aca783 at cm.nu
Mon Mar 15 16:09:02 EST 2004
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 02:47:19PM -0600, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> Is it possible that I could get the behavior described above with the
> older signatures, where mutt actually calls gpg to verify the
> signature, and the message status line shows "NS" instead of just "N"?
Try adding this fragment to your .procmailrc
:0
* !^Content-Type: message/
* !^Content-Type: multipart/
* !^Content-Type: application/pgp
{
:0 fBw
* ^-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
* ^-----END PGP MESSAGE-----
| formail \
-i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=encrypt"
:0 fBw
* ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
* ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
* ^-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| formail \
-i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign"
}
S
--
Shane Wegner
http://www.cm.nu/~shane/
More information about the Speakup
mailing list