editors

[Alex Snow]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

the two editors I use most often with speakup are emacs and nano. nano 
is a pico clone but it's opensource, has more features, and the cursor 
tracking works a lot better then pico. I don't use emacs as an editor 
more often I run stuff like tnt under it and it works quite nicely.

Slackware does infact install two emacs binaries one with x and one 
without. it really doesn't matter which one you use but if you didn't 
install the x series (bad idea since some packages are broken without 
it) then you need the emacs with no x support.
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 
09:50:20PM -0500, Kyrath. (AKA Rob) wrote:
> Hi, I'm slowly poking around my system and have been looking at the editors that are currently installed.  
> 1. Is there a particular editor that works very well with speakup?  Or alternatively, editors that don't work well at all?
> 2. Does speakup completely support the use of emacs, or does emacspeak need to be used instead?.
> Also, it appears that there are 2 versions of emacs on my system; emacs with-x, and emacs no-x.  I assume that the x version should be uninstalled and only use the no-x version. Right?
> 3. BTW, are there any word processors for linux that run under console mode?  I know there is open office, but that is for the x-windows system.  Right?
> Thanks for any suggestions
> -- Rob
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> 

- -- 
Always borrow money from a pessimist; he doesn't expect to be paid
back.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFASUYo9XVrM3ri110RAtrbAJ0azvkXIAR6RlMiLKnMlwCk/Eq0BQCfe7oe
V38slswwv3TgJQewI4OesJY=
=Rr2J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----