gpl question

[Gregory Nowak]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:04:00PM +0200, Hynek Hanke wrote:
> It just says that if you don't want to bother you with including the
> full license (because of it's lenght), you can use a much simpler
> license for such small code and it's still ok with FSF ethics. It
> doesn't say that you have to do so or that you should do so. There is
> no such requirement in GPL.
> 
> So if you think your program is valuable or it might grow in the
> future or whatever, it's perfectly ok to use GNU GPL. The size of your
> package will double (since you have to include the full text of GNU
> GPL into it), but if you don't mind, there is no problem.
> 

Ok, thanks. That's what I wasn't sure about.

Greg



- -- 
Free domains: http://www.eu.org/ or mail dns-manager at EU.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA0GXM7s9z/XlyUyARAmBeAJ9lnYQ4r3k3WktL8I+H8TdsLf8NmwCg2tzX
mJbRPbNH4Pt1v1nINcQly3o=
=MbHH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----