A good synth?

[Sina Bahram]

Are you serious? Wow, I thought DoubleTalk had to be the worst one
ever....that's sad that hardware synths are so bad....

Thanks for your reply

Take care,
Sina

-----Original Message-----
From: speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca [mailto:speakup-bounces at braille.uwo.ca]
On Behalf Of nick G
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 11:32 AM
To: sbahram at nc.rr.com; Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.
Subject: Re: A good synth?


That's as good as it gets.  Doubletalk is second only to dectalk in the
hardware arena in my opinion. Thanks, Nick
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sina Bahram" <sbahram at nc.rr.com>
To: "'Speakup is a screen review system for Linux.'"
<speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 11:05 AM
Subject: A good synth?


> Hi guys,
>
> I need a good hardware synth. My employer is willing to spend around 
> 300 bucks or so....I need it to work with a variety of linux apps, 
> like
SpeakUP
> for sure, and possibly EmacSpeak as well. Also anything else that uses 
> a hardware synth if that's possible.
>
> What's a good one people? In my opinion the DoubleTalk's quality is 
> just
> *shutter* but if that's the best for that price range, I guess I'll have
to
> go with that.
>
> Thank you all for any replies.
>
> Take care,
> Sina
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca 
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup


_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup at braille.uwo.ca http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup