Are ICMP packets important?
Alex Snow
alex_snow at gmx.net
Thu Feb 12 14:48:37 EST 2004
it looks like some kind of gateway. is it the address of your cable
modem?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:06:10AM -0500, Chuck Hallenbeck wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Janina,
>
> That was an interesting report. I find no surprises in it though.
> I have deliberately opened 113, and the others are open to
> support IRC CTCP protocols. They are open with no services
> running on them.
>
> On my ping failure, please look at this (everybody) and tell me
> what you see:
>
> PING yahoo.com (66.218.71.198) 56(84) bytes of data.
> >From 10.13.7.254 icmp_seq=3 Packet filtered
>
> - --- yahoo.com ping statistics ---
> 73 packets transmitted, 0 received, +1 errors, 100% packet loss,
> time 72093ms
>
> The second line shows an IP address that appears to be filtering
> out my ICMP packet, but the identity of that IP address is
> unknown to me and is not revealed by the 'host' command.
>
> I think I discovered the lock; now if I could only find the key!
>
> Chuck
>
>
> - --
> The Moon is Waning Gibbous (60% of Full)
> In a world without Fences or Walls no one needs Windows or Gates.
> My home page is now at http://www.mhcable.com/~chuckh
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQCVAwUBQCukfDVdG8M9x9tGAQITngP+KfDQ0neM3aVmdG93T9zkFfUx3ZsphBPt
> DSwwcBv8b6Oo+rxAe8/+0pVDzIcagIXvtFYlmco05FgF2qa4/d/dQwFnqu/YUBcQ
> VZN2sxelkAzsOCvAzaxWj+dE6NXBW4bOtQ1RmN6/GJX78AHyXd0g75OWSadoGrSL
> Ab0070/11rU=
> =2+1R
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
--
Always borrow money from a pessimist; he doesn't expect to be paid
back.
More information about the Speakup
mailing list