ip over ip tunneling
Ralph W. Reid
rreid at sunset.net
Wed Aug 11 13:55:16 EDT 2004
What you are describing here sounds like network address translation
(NAT) using masquerading. I have not done this for a while, but the
file /usr/doc/Linux-HOWTOs/Masquerading-Simple-HOWTO proved useful
once I found it on my Slackware system. As I recall, the systems must
be able to communicate with each other first before NAT will work
(kind of follows if a connection to the outside world is to be
established). The examples in the file I specified above are pretty
basic, and as you get more involved with firewalling, you may want to
do more with iptables. If you do not have access to the file I
mentioned above, let me know, and I can put it on my web site. Keep
plugging away at it--NAT and masquerading were pretty hard for me to
figure out at first, but I did eventually get the mess working. Let
me know if I can provide any more help. HTH and have a _great_ day.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 12:06:28PM -0500, Gregory Nowak wrote:
> . . .
> Ok, now that I've described all my problems, let me describe what it
> is that I want out of ipip. Simply put, I have 2 machines, machine a,
> and machine b. For my purposes, machine a is the client, machine b is
> the server. What I want is to have a 1-way tunnel, through which
> machine a would make only out-bound connections, using its tunnel to
> machine b, thus making it appear that the connections are coming from
> machine b's network.
>
> Can someone who is familiar with ip over ip describe for me what
> configuration steps I need to take on the client and server for my
> specific situation as described above? Also, please use different IP
> ranges (E.G. 172.16.x.x, and 192.168.x.x, where the 172 range would be
> the public addresses, and the 192 range would be the private addresses
> used in the tunnel) to make your explanation easier to understand?
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Greg
>
--
Ralph. N6BNO. Wisdom comes from central processing, not from I/O.
rreid at sunset.net http://personalweb.sunset.net/~rreid
Opinions herein are either mine or they are flame bait.
SECANT (x) = TAN (x) / COTAN (x)
More information about the Speakup
mailing list