ideas for Mozilla integration
ameer armaly
ameer at charter.net
Sun Apr 25 18:36:34 EDT 2004
Then wouldn't the code be floating around, and people could in theory
modify it a bit, and release their own product under a different name?
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Igor Gueths wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> True. However another thing that should possibly be considered is still
> commercialize it, however include the source code provided you pay for
> it. And then Freedombox could start a developer community, where
> bugs/patches could be submitted. The only problem I can see with this
> approach is that there is a chance that someone might release changes
> that they made under the GPL.
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 04:28:51PM -0400, Doug Sutherland wrote:
> > > this wonderful addition happens to be...proprietary.
> >
> > Presumaby Matt works for said company. If the software was not
> > proprietary, then how would Matt make a living? If all of the
> > world's software were free, there would be a whole lot of
> > unemployed programmers. I think you are going a bit too far
> > with your ideas on ethics. Software developers should be able
> > to earn money for their work. Would plumbers work for free
> > because of an ethical need for people to have water?
> >
> > -- Doug
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
> - --
> Failure is not an option, it comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFAjB/dNohoaf1zXJMRApKxAKCgCvI2pD3sKkQUgzbW/LNSCAnfpgCgjI6F
> +nuqyloTe868y7RaOKG+Zbk=
> =/Rxk
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
More information about the Speakup
mailing list