Distributions with speakup modified kernels?

Alex Snow alex_snow at gmx.net
Mon Dec 1 18:18:34 EST 2003


use slackware. it's reaaaaaaly stable.
and comes with a speakup modified kernel in the stock distribution.
On 
Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:21:00PM -0000, Darragh wrote:
> Hello,
> Ok, I've installed and messed around with Fedora but I'm sick of people, a
> certain person in this country telling me that its not stable, there are
> still bugs, its still an alfa bla bla bla.
> 
> My question:
> I'm being advised to go for another distribution.  Red hat 9 was suggested.
> If I do indeed go for another distribution what would you suggest?  I will
> mainly use speakup and if I can ever get it to work, emacspeak however, I'd
> like to mess around with gnome and gnopernicus.
> 
> I've just spent the last three hours trying to figure out why Winblows xp
> stopped recognising the NTFS partition on this disk when I should have being
> working on stuff for deadlines due tomorrow.
> 
> I'd really appreciate any views you have about any distribution of Linux
> that you've used successfully with speakup.
> The distros that were suggested are:
> mandrake,
> slackware,
> red hat
> suSE
> and
> Free BSD.
> 
> please please let me know.
> 
> 
> Darragh
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup

-- 
Always borrow money from a pessimist; he doesn't expect to be paid
back.





More information about the Speakup mailing list