redhat problems

[Thomas D. Ward]

Hi, you must understand the removal of speakup was strictly technical by
nature. Allot of the people on list are out to get Red Hat for pulling
speakup when there are technical issues that need and should be resolved.
One technical issue I agree with Red Hat on is a moduler version of speakup
as rather than the current way speakup is compiled into the kernel direct.
If I had the time and patients to do so I would do so myself, but it really
is a big undertaking to modulerize speakup.

----- Original Message -----
From: Nick Gawronski <nick at nickgawronski.com>
To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 5:25 PM
Subject: redhat problems


>       Hi, We must do something about all of these problems with redhat.
> Think about it, rh8 had speakup and it was working just fine but look what
> has happend rh9 is here and we don't have speakup yet the
> readme-accessibility file is in 9 that says that redhat wants to make
> their products accessible.  Well, I don't think that they are beeing very
> nice about this at all.  If they removed speakup they should of removed
> readme-accessbility as well.  We must contact redhat and find out "why did
> you remove speakup yet leave readme-accessibility"  That is what we need
> to do about this.  Who says they have a right to put speakup in one
> version then take it away.  Think about this because we can make them put
> it back in to their product.  bye
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup