RH9 disks on the net.

[Janina Sajka]

No not quite. Nor can you provide it, as it doesn't exist.

Two instances of a too-tight RCE policy with no disability accomodations doesn't make a deliberate policy, nor does it constitute "many attempts" to my mind.

But, more to the point, your original message in this thread claimed the removal of Speakup from the RH 9 kernel is a result of this deliberate policy you imagine. So,
let me ask you a simple question?

When did Red Hat change from an inclusive policy to a deliberately discriminatory one? Since they decided on their own to include Speakup in Red Hat 8.0, there must
have been an inclusive policy at some time. Would you now claim they've actively and deliberately changed their minds in the past six months? How do YOU account for
Speakup in the 8.0 kernel distribution?



> From: "Darrell Shandrow" <nu7i at azboss.net>
>
> Hi Janina,
>
> If you are continuing to read the messages of this thread, you are learning
> of the evidence.  I consider Red Hat's actions to be deliberate.  Ignorance
> can not be claimed, since many attempts at enlightenment have been made.  I
> stand by my consideration of their policies of sub-human treatment for the
> blind as being deliberate.
>
> Darrell Shandrow - Shandrow Communications!
> Technology consultant/instructor, network/systems administrator!
> A+, CCNA, Network+!
> Check out high quality telecommunications services at http://ld.net/?nu7i
> All the best to coalition forces carrying out Operation Iraqi Freedom!

-- 
	
				Janina Sajka, Director
				Technology Research and Development
				Governmental Relations Group
				American Foundation for the Blind (AFB)

Email: janina at afb.net		Phone: (202) 408-8175