RH9 disks on the net.

[Luke Davis]

Now *that* is what you should have said the first time.

I should have said "fact".

Luke

On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Janina Sajka wrote:

> Luke Davis writes:
> > From: Luke Davis <ldavis at shellworld.net>
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Janina Sajka wrote:
> >
> > > Luke Davis writes:
>
> False.
>
>
> There is no evidence of any deliberation, nor of any decision.
>
> There is certainly evidence that special accomodations were not allowed.
> I would certainly agree that they should haave been allowed. That would
> constitute a reasonable accomodation and thus be more likely to equalize
> the opportunity. But, that isn't the same as people sitting down to say
> "let's stick it to this person." That's what "deliberately deny" means.
>
> Did they deny equal access? Arguably so, by virtue of not making
> reasonable and appropriate accomodations. Was that a "deliberate
> decision to deny?" Bull..
>
> Ignorance and lack of consideration? Yes. "Deliberate decision to deny."
> Hardly.
>
> Or, perhaps you're privvy to some smoking memo? Or the meeting agenda
> where this deliberate decision was reached?
>
> So, thaat's one supposed fact in question. You did say "facts," as in
> the plural. So, what else
> > >
> > > "I have not investigated, and do not intend to investigate, the facts he
> > >  listed."
> > >
> > > Facts? What facts? There were no "facts" in that post, just allegations.
> > > Rather outrageous ones, too.
> >
> > Regarding:
> >
> > > Some will recall that Red Hat recently decided to deliberately deny
> > > equal access to its training material as offered to those whom decide to
> > > take their week-long RHCE training classes.  Oh, well...
> >
> > Is this false?  Did they, or did they not, make these inaccessible?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>