OLD DAYS

[Alex Snow]

Thats what What I thought.  The newer bns and blt units have improved
pronounciation over the echo, but the same sounding voice.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gregory Nowak" <greg at romualt.dhs.org>
To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: OLD DAYS


> The legacy bns (that's what FS likes to call them now) and the echo speech
synth sound the same because they share the same speech chip.
> Greg
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 05:27:28PM -0500, Adam Myrow wrote:
> > If you can understand the Braille 'N Speak, you can understand the Echo.
> > At least to me, they sound very similar.
> >
> > Yes, I remember BEX.  It had those cryptic commands like " $$c " to
center
> > text.  You absolutely had to put the spaces around them or they wouldn't
> > work.  I used it with an embosser called an Ohtsuki.  Obviously made in
> > Japan.  It was a really slow embosser that could produce both Braille
and
> > print, but neither was very sharp.  The Braille felt like the paper had
> > been stepped on, and everybody said that the print was very faint like
it
> > needed a new ribbon even when it had a brand new one.  It wasn't a
ribbon,
> > but a little rubber wheel and it had holes at the end of each page to
> > detect the end of the page.  Weird!
> >
> > I even used a shell account from an Apple IIGS and that was my first
> > experience with Pine.  That's why I still use Pine even though some say
> > Mutt is better.  It's hard to change when you've been using Pine that
> > long.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>