Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'

[Alex Snow]

Will I don't ever have to worry about aol, since I'm never using them!!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Igor Gueths" <igueths at attbi.com>
To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'


It is also a person's responsibility to take responsible for content
transmitted through their network, not Aohell timewarner to go probing
peoples' hds for mp3s? No way man! Will never get even read access to my hd.
----- Original Message -----
From: Alex Snow <alex_snow at gmx.net>
To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'


> I would agree.  It's the recepiant's responsibility to keep there
antivirus
> up to date and working, not the list owner's to filter it.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dawes, Stephen" <Stephen.Dawes at gov.calgary.ab.ca>
> To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:04 PM
> Subject: RE: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'
>
>
> All you are doing is introducing censorship!
>
> If you are a windows user for reading your mail, and don't want your
> computer attacked with every virus that happens down the wire, then get an
> anti virus program and run it on your computer.
>
> If you don't like HTML in in your messages, do like some members of the
list
> do, and right a process to strip it off. In fact, if you ask the right
> people, they may even share what they have already developed for this
> process. (No, I am not the one using a stripping process.)
>
> There are reasons for people to have their format set the way in which
they
> do, and I don't think that a list should be censoring the formatting of a
> message.
>
> In my case, the corporate standard is to have the email client respond to
a
> message in the same format that it was sent in. They would also prefer use
> of html so that any url's sent in a message are easily accessed, and
active.
>
> So, if you choose to implement such a form of censorship, then I guess
that
> I will be dropped from the list automatically. Yes some of you will say no
> loss, but then I guess I would no longer be able to help those where and
> when I can. To those people, I will say sorry in advance, list censorship
> prevents me from assisting you.
>
> Come on, folks, take some responsibility for your own set ups, and stop
> trying to pass off the responsibility on to some else. There is too much
of
> NIMBY in the world today to have it show up here on the list.
> (NIMBY, Not In My BackYard!)
>
> Frankly, I am tired of hearing about the email formatting woes, and that
is
> all this thread is about, when you dig down to the bottom of the problem.
> A wolf in sheep's clothing is still a wolf!
>
> "But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong!" (Dennis Miller)
>
> Steve Dawes
> PH:  (403) 268-5527.
> Mailto:  sdawes at gov.calgary.ab.ca
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Igor Gueths [mailto:igueths at attbi.com]
> > Sent: 2002 May 14 2:10 PM
> > To: speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > Subject: Re: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'
> >
> >
> > Hi. I think that this method is both better and more
> > standard. I wouldn't mind if messages were restricted to
> > text. I don't transmit in html anyway.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: 'Georgina' <y>
> > To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 2:48 PM
> > Subject: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'
> >
> >
> > > Hi All
> > >
> > > Because of the use of html messages being used to transmit Windows
> > > viruses, I wondered if folks would agree to having list messages
> > > restricted to plain text only?
> > >
> > > The list owner will act upon whatever the consensus is.
> > >
> > > Gena
> > >
> > > Have your say:
> > > Blindness Advocacy and Self Help Online www.bashonline.org
> > >
> > > Please don't send me MS Word documents, see
> > > http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
> > >
> > > Personal Contact Details:
> > > E-mail: gena at gena-j.net WWW: http://www.gena-j.net ICQ: 144169465
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup


_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup