Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'

David Poehlman poehlman1 at comcast.net
Tue May 14 19:38:29 EDT 2002


what dat? dot net?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Igor Gueths" <igueths at attbi.com>
To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'


Hi Greg. Yes pretty much I believe it was their idea. All they want to
do is combine everything into one i.e., html into e-mail, internet
destroyer bolted into w98. They also think winblows is so smart,
recognizing <aHref> and formulating urls into hyperlinks? Wow!
Impressive! What if I want to read the text of that link and not your
crappy rendition? Then what?
----- Original Message -----
From: Gregory Nowak <greg at romualt.dhs.org>
To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'


> Wasn't it originally macroslop's idea that html and e-mail were one
and the same?
> Greg
>
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:54:49PM -0400, Igor Gueths wrote:
> > Hi all. I think that it is peoples' responsibility to change their
messages to plain text, but even if the list were restricted to plain
text, I wouldn't mind. Also, e-mail and html should be separated. There
should be a difference between the web and the rest of the internet.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Igor Gueths <igueths at attbi.com>
> > To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'
> >
> >
> > Hi. I think that this method is both better and more standard. I
wouldn't mind if messages were restricted to text. I don't transmit in
html anyway.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: 'Georgina' <gena at gena-j.net>
> > To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 2:48 PM
> > Subject: Consensus opinion required - was 'more worms'
> >
> >
> > > Hi All
> > >
> > > Because of the use of html messages being used to transmit Windows
> > > viruses, I wondered if folks would agree to having list messages
> > > restricted to plain text only?
> > >
> > > The list owner will act upon whatever the consensus is.
> > >
> > > Gena
> > >
> > > Have your say:
> > > Blindness Advocacy and Self Help Online www.bashonline.org
> > >
> > > Please don't send me MS Word documents, see
> > > http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
> > >
> > > Personal Contact Details:
> > > E-mail: gena at gena-j.net WWW: http://www.gena-j.net ICQ: 144169465
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speakup mailing list
> > > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup


_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup





More information about the Speakup mailing list