Mozilla

[David Poehlman]

freedom scientific does use msaa more and more.  It is just not the core
of their activity since they already had a good modem.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Igor Gueths" <igueths at attbi.com>
To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: Mozilla


Hi. Well what Greg said makes sense. Unless Freedom science fiction
decided to make their own variation of msaa, which I think is highly
unlikely.

Explorer has caused a general protection fault in module kernel32.dll.
I'm sick of Winblows!
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, David Poehlman wrote:

> I wouldn't jump to any conclusions.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gregory Nowak" <greg at romualt.dhs.org>
> To: <speakup at braille.uwo.ca>
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Mozilla
>
>
> Since window-eyes already supports anything with msaa, I think
gw-micro
> is covered for netscape support if it indeed contains msaa.
> Greg
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 09:51:03AM -0400, Whitley GS11 Cecil H wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I hesitate to even mention this because I don't want to start
another
> > battle.  However, I feel that there is a segment of this community
> that this
> > effects and who will be interested.  Yesterday in my wanderings (I
was
> > checking out the latest status of Gnome) I ran across some very
> interesting
> > information.  Mozilla currently supports MSAA on the Windows
platform.
> > Since the VP of development for Freedom Scientific had testified in
> April
> > that Netscape does not support accessability I found it curious to
say
> the
> > least that Netscape uses Mozilla's technology in it's latest browser
> and
> > therefore supports both MSAA and DOM.
> >
> > Okay, what's my point?  Simply this, I wrote
> > suggestions at freedomscientific.com and requested that they support
> Mozilla on
> > the Windows platform given that the Mozilla developers are suporting
> > accessability in their product.  I indicated that I felt their
company
> > should suport Mozilla at least as well as they suport Internet
> Explorer
> > given that it provides more choice for the visually impaired
> community.  I
> > know that some of the users on this list would benefit from
experience
> with
> > Mozilla on windows so that they are "up to speed" on it once it is
> available
> > under Gnome.  So with that said, I would like to request that if you
> are a
> > jaws user (or any other windows screen reader for that matter) that
> you let
> > your voice be heard by your respective vendor.
> >
> > I realize that lynx and links won't go away simply because a GUI is
> > available, however much of the point of Mozilla is it's ability to
be
> > imbedded within apps.  Feedback from the community as a whole would
be
> > benificial to insure that the product is as accessable as possible
for
> those
> > who will "have" to use it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Cecil
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speakup mailing list
> > Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> > http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup
>


_______________________________________________
Speakup mailing list
Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup