zip salck

[Gregory Nowak]

Unless slackware would take it upon themselves to add speakup and the few other modifications into zipslack to make it compatible with zipspeak, then yes, there still is a reason why zipspeak should be maintained separately.
Greg


On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:08:01AM -0400, Patrick Turnage wrote:
> Hello
> I believe zipspeak is a modified version of zipslack from slackware.
> Zipslack is a version of slackware Linux with a minimul set of applications
> and is installed in to a Ums-dos file system, this allows you to extract
> the zip file and then run Linux with out having to repartition your hard
> drive. I am not certain exactly how zipspeak differs from zipslack in what
> is installed but zipspeak has been preconfigured to work with speakup. I
> wonder though with slackware including speakup by default is there a reason
> to maintain the zipspeak distribution? 
> Patrick
> 
> 
> 
>         -------------------------
> Patrick Turnage
> e-mail:pturnage at tampabay.rr.com
> Telephone: (850) 459-7717
> HomePage: http://www.access-connect.com
> Amateur radio callsign:kg4dqk
> AOL Instant Messenger:kg4dqk
> icq:26862191
> MSN:turnagep at hotmail.com
> Yahoo!:kg4dqk
> America Online:kg4dqk1129 kg4dqk1129 at aol.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Speakup mailing list
> Speakup at braille.uwo.ca
> http://speech.braille.uwo.ca/mailman/listinfo/speakup